| STANDARDS
FOR "VALIDITY"
(good reference: MRO ALERT, VOL.VI, No.1 Jan/Feb 1995
p.15)
VALID SPECIMEN MEANS: NOT UNSUITABLE AND NOT ADULTERATED!
CATEGORY I: Straightforward!
Specimen is DILUTE! Sp.Gr. < 1.003 AND Creatinine
< 20. M.R.O. reports lab findings (including negative
or canceled test) to employer. A dilute specimen is
NOT a reasonable suspicion or cause to require donor
to submit to another specimen collection........ HOWEVER....
Employer MAY require "witnessed collection"
the next time this donor falls due for testing.
CATEGORY II: The "gray zone!
Specimen is UNSUITABLE! This applies when a valid immunoassay
result is not achieved (abnormal high or low readings)
or pH out of normal range, but the presence of adulterants
is not substantiated. MRO actions: Discuss with lab's
chief scientist. Contact donor and inform that specimen
was unsuitable. Ask especially about NSAID's or other
explanations. If no explanation, inform donor and employer
that another specimen will be collected under direct
observation. If there is an acceptable explanation for
the unsuitability, the MRO should report "canceled
test."
CATEGORY III: Straightforward! (Adulterated = Refusal
to test)
Specimen is ADULTERATED! Specific adulterant(s) identified
by the laboratory through procedures that can be forensically
validated! MRO reports "adulterated" to employer
& informs employer that this constitutes "refusal
to test." This has the impact of a positive test
requiring removal from safety-sensitive function.
| Marijuana |
| Effects |
| |
| Incidence
of Abuse |
| |
| Chemical
Name |
| |
| Forms
and Street Names |
| |
| Preferred
routes of administration |
| |
| Length
of time detectable after user |
| |
| Metabolite
Actually sought in urine |
| |
| Confounding
drugs (or factors): |
| |
| Screening
Cut-off: |
| |
| Confirmation
GC/MS Cut-off: |
| |
| Facts
for Verifying M.R.O |
| |
|